Well we have an Airport Edition, so why not an airline version?
Examples:
IATA: BA, G3, RG, DL, LX
ICAO: BAW, GLO, VRG, DAL, SWR
- ICAO
- IATA
0 voters
Well we have an Airport Edition, so why not an airline version?
Examples:
IATA: BA, G3, RG, DL, LX
ICAO: BAW, GLO, VRG, DAL, SWR
0 voters
Cebu Pacific - 5J
ICAO - CEB
Depends
Swiss
LX ???
SWR (inherited from SWissaiR)
OTT Airlines - MU
ICAO - CES…?
Jeez…
Flynas - XY
ICAO - KNE
7I cool
IATA is completely random.
Take Singapore for example.
SIA - the complete acronym.
SQ? doesn’t make any sense.
Should be SG tbh
I like ICAO better, but I’m more used to IATA. So I’m kinda in a pickle.
The IATA codes are all leftovers except for a few dozen airlines, which had first dibs
Idk… I like IATA better imo because it’s just cleaner. Take Southwest for example, I like “WN” better then “SWA”, not sure why.
Also American, “AA” is so much better than “AAL”.
And “SQ” is kinda cool ngl
Yeah, some IATAs like UA, AA and BA are better, but LX is just wth
Yeah but IATA is random
Like SWA would be easier to guess even for non avgeeks
CX, NH, EK, SQ… the list is endless
also SWR vs LX
But organizational purposes make IATA so much better
SWA takes too much room whereas WN doesnt
One letter…
WN means nothing tho
should be SW