If they increase their price, they’ll most likely lose a big percentage of their user base tbh
But Microsoft it’s not good too.
Since they are working for graphics, and not for realism
Microsoft never lost an user
A good simulator, well
You can find it in the schools for flying planes
They are really expensive btw.
10 million or something there
dude from bonaire is back
The good details don’t make the loads of bad things in and around IF look good.
and the main question is: what essay is he cooking
AroAce creature from the Eastern Caribbean has appeared.
I don’t write essays, maybe the people on AWW (which closed like 1,5 years ago) and the IFC do, though.
A330 gear, A350 cockpit, wrong E175 winglet, wacky 777 physics that took years to be fixed…
RollsAir (Philippine Airlines) livery being incorrect, 777 fanblades, holes in most plane models, no windows in newer planes (A330 for example) etc etc.
Also, they decided to be lazy and choose the 2 emergency exits for the 757, not the 4 exits over the wing, which makes most liveries incorrect, United for example.
And the A330… Couldn’t even add another engine, or change the sound like everybody asked for…
They’re basically “Oh we’ll do what we want, they’ll support us later anyways when they forget about it.”
Don’t forget the incorrect liveries…
Like how the hell do you forget an entire airline logo on the side of a plane? Sure, 1 person might miss it, but 5-10 people…?
Oh damn, the Alaska Salmon livery replacement actually looks quite pretty.
@DeltaDev13 come look.
I like it a lot
me who doesn’t like it at all
KLM orange pride 77W that I think has long been fixed?
Sure it has bugs. All sims do.
You wanna compare livery quality between RFS and IF?
Forget it y’all, have a good day