If the max or 777x aren’t classic but others in the family are, how is the 767-400 a classic
I already said why
this isn’t “is there”
“Because it’s part of the 767 family” but the max is the 737 family and 777X is in the 777 family
1 Like
I sorta see that, but didn’t you once say that anything released after 1985 would never be a classic?
typo 100
hello
but still it is flying komputer
If you see it you won’t unsee it… there’s something very satisfying in this image 
(again A320-100 without wingtip fences)
1 Like
It’s okay I guess
1 Like
it looks bland in my opinion
I genuinely love a good flat wing, but not on Airbuses.
2 Likes
Yes but the 767-400 is really only updated wingtips and cockpit instruments.
It’s still a classic in its configuration
Just like when the 757/767 got winglets. It’s no different. And the 757/767 have updated cockpits too now
Just because Boeing still makes the 767-300 today doesn’t mean it isn’t a classic at its roots
1 Like
Part 13 already? Am I missing something?
1 Like
Hello y’all have u been spamming all night lol?
1 Like
hey tuna man and rolls
2 Likes
tuna man 
royce
different users for me
@tunamkol - tuna man
@PlanesAndGames - PNG
@ThatOne9WPlen - 9Wplen
@anon5856544 - jAcob
@DeltaDev13 - deVin
@PlanesAndGames - zhoppie
@BonaireDude - gote boi
6 Likes