How is that? Because only one of those applies to the 757? Lol
Literally none of them apply to the 757, they stretched it once and nothing else!
I wonder what the neo would look like with fence tips, and the max with just regular winglets
Thatâs an image
And then the A220 and E190 winglets switched
Because you donât know when to be quiet.
If it wasnât for Boeing making the cockpits bigger on the MAX, I wouldâve gone with the NEO
I genuinely prefer the older ones (that are still mostly used on 737s)
Explain
Same here (i mean look my pfp lol)
757 >A321
737 Classic, NG and MAX: nervous sweating
What you just described was how literally all 737 variants after the -200 came to be.
Well you see, Boeing has never marketed the aircraft as a middle market aircraft, theyâve always kept it in the short haul sector, what are 737-MAXs designed to replace according to Boeing? Other 737s and A320s. What does the A321XLR replace according to Airbus? The 757, which simply doesnât work
A321 competing with 757 makes 0 sense
What about the MAX 10? How many seats does that hold compared to the 752?
737MAX-10 : Dense short haul
757 : Long haul, with less load
Grazias
Thatâs why I only quoted the take, stretch and add engines bit. They havenât marketed it as a mid-sized aircraft it can fill the lower end of that sector with range to easily fly trans-Atlantic. On the passenger side of things, no, itâs not a mid-market aircraft.
Yeah. Last I checked the A321NEO or XLR canât fly from Portland to Keflavik
while the 757 can