depends on the airline
Not really, the MAX-7’s and -8’s beat their counterparts (319neo and 320neo) in terms of range. The only difference is the 321neo on the MAX-10 (MAX-9 doesn’t really fit into any of these, so I just moved them off to the side)
Hence why I said average. I would argue that the A321LR and XLR are NEOs so adding those in, the average is quite higher (315.5nm to be exact).
MAX Range
MAX7: 3850nm
MAX8: 3550nm
MAX9: 3550nm
MAX10: 3300nm
AVG: 3564.5nm
NEO Range
A319neo: 3700nm
A320neo: 3400nm
A321neo: 3500nm
A321LR: 4100nm
A321XLR: 4700nm
AVG: 3880nm
1 Like
That’s less range than LAX-PHX
Plus I wouldn’t say the XLR and A321NEO aren’t competitors for the 737MAX Family, more of the 757
But if it is against the 737MAX, then yes, they have the edge over the 737
Fine 
American’s A321neos are not at all bad. They have decent legroom and wide aisles. The bathrooms are in pretty inconvenient locations tho.
1 Like
How many different door configurations are there? Like 3?
1 Like
It’s the widest of narrowbodies, that’s what sets it apart.
1 Like
Yes there are quite a few
There’s a standard, a FLEX (for more seats) and one more that I forgot
1 Like
Also, the AA A321neos have very little border between sections. So if there’s a baby crying anywhere on the plane, it’ll ring out like the Big Ben.
1 Like
Oh, I parked next to this one at OGG today!
2 Likes
This exact plane? Wow!
1 Like
I Disagree, the NEO had horrible seats when I flew on it to Phoenix, yeah it looked and felt like a sardine can, my A319 was better than it
But it does look hot
1 Like
It really depends on the airline,
1 Like
I’m going all off of AA tbh, thats all I fly.
Nah, AA always sucks
*Hard Products
1 Like
Cough cough, I’m sorry, did you say something…RUDE! @Ethan
2 Likes
Nope, the regular NEO can go farther than any of the Maxes.
1 Like