Boeing 767 VS Airbus A330

A picture

lol

gotta agree the 762 looks too short

It’s height to width is kinda wack. It’s skinny, and that makes it’s height look disproportionate

1 Like

Boeing 764

1 Like

767-200 doesn’t look that great, 300 is good, and 400 is the best.

My list (from best-looking to worst-looking)

767-300 without winglets
767-300 with winglets
767-200 and 767-400
A330-200
A330-300

3 Likes

Yeah that’s pretty accurate

1 Like

b u t t e r

Both are good, but sorry - the A330 is better.

1 Like

Just for that stupid tilt?

3 Likes

Face it or not, the A330 is newer, more efficient and has a greater range.

1 Like

And you wouldn’t wanna hate Azul which flies A330, would you?

1 Like

aka not direct competitors. The A330 is much larger than the 767. Somewhere between the 767 and 777-200. No surprise the A330neo is Airbus’ answer to the 787

2 Likes

The A330-300 is a direct competitor to the original non ER 772

1 Like

I believe that was what the A340-300 was supposed to do?

2 Likes

That was the 777-200ER with more range

1 Like

And it didn’t fail
The neo
The 787 is way too underpowered in my opinion

1 Like

787 is decently powered imo

also this is getting off-topic lol

2 Likes

767 is much better

2 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.