767 vs 787

767-200ER go brrrrt

1 Like

767 all the way!

I mean paired with its sibling, you’d never need anything else for high and low demand short and long routes.

Boeing has made great planes for all areas of aviation. You’d only ever need to buy Boeing.

737, 757, 767, 747

Boom. that’s all you need

2 Likes

yes
and
you forgot 777 and 787

1 Like

No
I’m talking about these specifically.

Not newer planes

1 Like

oh
20 yr old 777 : do i look like a joke to you?

1 Like

20 years isn’t that old

I’m talking about 737 and 747 era to 757 and 767 era.

1 Like

Plus why have a twin engine 777 when you can have the 4 engine 747

1 Like

ok

idk
sounds

1 Like

747>777

1 Like

BuT tHe Co2 EmIsSiOnS!!!

2 Likes

greenpeace is angery

1 Like

The 777 is already 27 tho…

If Greenpeace is angry at a 777 why wouldn’t they be angry at a 747

1 Like

And they’re the ones who used aerosol cans then drove home in their cars

3 Likes

they will be more angery on 747

lmao true

3 Likes

B-52: Exists

1 Like

lol
8 engines

1 Like

Won’t they be happy at the modern wars

1 Like

they will go with green paint in aerosol cans in gas cars to show how eco-friendly they are

3 Likes

Imagine their faces when they learn how much fuel a single tank burns

2 Likes